Wednesday, February 19, 2014

WEDDING WEDNESDAY–Things are not always what they seem….or what they say



When we evaluate records we know that we have to take all evidence we find and combine it with other evidence in order to come to a conclusion.  

We also know that our ancestors weren’t always truthful when they gave information to be entered on forms or when they talked to enumerators.  

Here is a perfect example.

Bessie Lindsay is my Grandaunt on my paternal side.  She was my grandmother’s younger sister.  She married William Bryant Curry, Jr. on 11 Sep 1911 in Windsor, Essex, Ontario, Canada.  Her status on the marriage record is listed as spinster (what we now call single).

Lindsay_Bessie_Curry_William_Marriage in Canada 1911
MARRIAGE OF BESSIE LINDSAY TO WILLIAM CURRY - 1911

Now look at her marriage to Stewart Frances Hockster on 19 Jul 1913 in Windsor, Essex, Ontario, Canada.  

LINDSAY_Bessie to Stewart HOCKSTER_1913_Canada
MARRIAGE OF ELIZABETH AKA BESSIE LINDSAY TO STEWART HOCKSTER - 1913

What is her status listed as?  Spinster.  Not divorced or widowed.

And her name is listed as?  Lindsay….not Curry.

We learned that Bessie did divorce her first husband, William Curry and gained full custody of their minor child.  

Why did Bessie aka Elizabeth say she was a spinster when she appeared before the magistrate for the second marriage?  Was it because back in those days it wasn’t considered desirable to be a divorced woman?  This is not the first incident of this kind that I have found in my family.  Or was there another reason?  We may never know.

TIP:  Always look at all the details on any document.  Never believe everything you see on any document.  With good research techniques you can combine evidence and come to a solid conclusion.

Other posts you may be interested in:
WHERE WERE THEY MARRIED WEDNESDAY?  

Happy hunting,

Michigan Girl

Copyright ©  2014   Diane Gould Hall

2 comments:

  1. I found a great aunt who married the same man twice according to two marriage licenses I found. She used her proper maiden name the first time but her married name the second time. I wish there was someone still alive to explain that. It also appears she had two sons both with the same name but two different birth years. Did the first son die? They divorced? They remarried? And son #2 was born?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. T - We also have couple who divorced and then remarried and children with the same first name, in the same family. Most of the time it was after the first child died and then the next son or daughter was named in their honor. Gotta love our ancestors. If they only knew how much we need to talk to them :)
      Thanks for stopping by.

      Delete

I look forward to reading your comments. If you have any connection to the people mentioned in this blog, please let me know. I write about mine and my husband's ancestors and would welcome new information or meeting a new cousin or two. Thanks for visiting and come back soon.