I consider myself a novice when it comes to DNA. Although I've taken many classes and seminars, I still have a lot to learn. I'm getting there......slowly.
One of the most Aha! moments I've had came when I was looking at my husband's DNA on GedMatch. This was the number one match on his One to Many list.
(CLICK ON ANY IMAGE TO ENLARGE IT)
The exciting thing was that I noticed there is a Gedcom associated with this match. That means I can go into the Gedcom and try to find those 2nd great grandparents and see if I can locate the match.
NOTE: When I click on the GED link a screen comes up with "Individual Detail Display" This gives me some information on the specific match, but not what I'm looking for. So, I always click on "Pedigree."
This pedigree is pretty full, which is exciting. I count back from the point person to the level of 2nd great grandparents. I browse down that level in the pedigree chart to see if I recognize any names. BINGO! There is a surname I immediately recognize as being associated with my husband's line, CUPPS. And the location in Pennsylvania also fits.
I immediately go to my Legacy database and find the only Cupps entry I have, which happens to be the first wife of my husband's 2nd GREAT GRANDFATHER. Now that's exciting as it is in line with what the shared DNA indicated.
I didn't even know that my husband's 2nd great grandfather, William W. Bright (1835-1916) had a first wife until I received his Civil War pension file. I only knew about his second wife, Mary Jane Flynn, which is whom I thought my husband descended from, based on dates and other records.
Mmmmm..........could I be wrong? I'm certainly anxious to find out.
Was my husband's great grandfather, Ellmer E. Bright the son of Mary Jane Flynn or Catherine Cupps?
I set out on a research mission to find out all I could about the CUPPS names listed in that Gedcom file that was a match to my husband's DNA.
The first thing I did was try to find the 2nd great grandparents listed on that Gedcom in GedMatch, Henry Cupps and Catherine Strauss. I went over to Ancestry.com, where my husband's DNA is located. I immediately found a public tree with the same pedigree as the one on GedMatch.
There are Henry Cupps and Catherine Strauss and two of their children, Sarah and Catherine.
That, of course, isn't good enough for me, but it's surely a strong indication.
I located Henry Cupps and his wife Catherine in the 1850 census and guess who two of the children were......that's right, Sarah and Catherine Cupps. Further proof.
Next, I began reviewing the dates of marriages for William W. Bright and his two wives and the dates of death of both women.
We all know that prior to about 1900 anything is possible. You may or may not find records. A strong indicator of when William's first wife Catherine Cupps died is in his Civil War pension file. In his deposition he states that she died "during the war." That puts her death between 1861 and 1865. Also in the pension file is the date of the marriage of William to Catherine Cupps, 1853 in Sharpsburg, Allegheny, Pennsylvania. Further reading in the pension file gives her death date of August 1862. Also listed in that pension file are the names and years of birth of all of William's children from both marriages, including Ellmer E. Bright (my husband's direct line), who is said to have been born in 1861. I had a year of birth for him of 1859. Either way, he was born prior to Catherine Cupps death and prior to William marrying his second wife in Feb 1864.
I have more research to do to bring out all the details for this family.
- First of all, I didn't look closely enough at the Civil War pension file. I read though it a couple of times and caught, what I thought, were most of the details.
- I didn't consider or look closely enough at the years of birth for all six children born to William W. Bright. I don't have a death certificate or register of death, but I do have an obituary and a probate record for Ellmer. The obituary gives his age at death of 29 years and 5 months. Given his date of death that would indicate he was born in November 1859.
- This family was one of the very first I worked on back in 2003-2004. Not an excuse, but certainly a reason for all of us to review ALL of our work.
- I have officially changed my husband's direct line and now have Catherine Cupps as his 2nd great grandmother instead of Mary Jane Flynn.
This match showed up as the first hit on GedMatch.
On Ancestry it is buried several pages down with the 4th - 6th cousin matches.
I have yet to check on MyHeritage and FtDNA where my husband's test is also uploaded.
Have you had similar experiences? Are you using your DNA matches to verify or disprove your paper trail?
OTHER POSTS THAT MAY BE OF INTEREST
AMANUENSIS MONDAY - The Last Will & Testament of Ellmer E. Bright
SURNAME SATURDAY - Who Was Daisy Bright? (my husband's grandmother)
If you are connected with the families mentioned here, I would love to hear from you.
Copyright © 2010-2017 Diane Gould HallALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO USE WITHOUT PERMISSION
Congratulations, Diane, on getting a match with a person who has their GEDCOM attached to their DNA. Have fun documenting your husband's new branch of the family tree!ReplyDelete
Thanks Cathy. Now, if I can just continue this with all those dang brick walls in my own family. I'm starting to "get it' where DNA is concerned and that should help a lot.Delete
Nice! Thanks for sharing an example of how helpful DNA can be to all of us!ReplyDelete
Thanks Dana. It is certainly adding a difference dimension to our research.Delete
Sometimes when looking at those gedcoms in the pedigree view, you can expand the generations further as far as 14 generations! Makes it easier to see the limits of the matches' research but with a pedigree that far back (as DNA only stretches to 6-7 generations?), I zero in on the locations. I immediately uploaded a Gedcom when I read this about your experience with your husband's family. Also thanks for pointing out the MRCA (generations) column at GEDmatch. I am still a DNA beginner.Delete
I agree Magda, I've expanded those generations too. I realize that I'm dealing with an estimated MRCA, so I will always look at the generation before and after. I've tried looking at locations when I don't see a familiar name and thus far haven't made any connections. I believe the fault is mine as I'm still not good at seeing a connection without a name I recognize. I'm a work in progress where DNA research is concerned :) :) Have fun with yours.Delete
It was a lot of fun to follow along with you on this. I haven't tested yet, but I will soon.ReplyDelete
Tests are on sale right now Anna. Good luck. Have fun.Delete